This article reflects information available at the time of publication and will be updated as further industry reaction and details emerge.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has confirmed a sweeping gambling tax increase in a Budget that was partially revealed early following a mistaken release by the Office for Budget Responsibility. Remote gaming duty will rise from 21 percent to 40 percent after the OBR’s economic and fiscal outlook document was published in error. The watchdog has since launched an internal investigation and issued an apology for what it described as a technical error.
Addressing the Commons, Reeves said remote gambling is associated with the highest levels of harm and would now carry the heaviest tax burden. In contrast, in-person gambling and horseracing are left untouched after months of steady pressure from the racing world. Bingo duty will be abolished entirely from April 2026, lifting a quiet but heavy burden from Britain’s bingo halls.
Reeves said the measures are expected to raise more than £1 billion by 2031 as part of a wider £26 billion tax package. While income tax thresholds remain frozen and national insurance and VAT are untouched, gambling taxation is now at the centre of the Budget’s revenue strategy.
The gambling sector, already identified as undertaxed relative to other industries, became the obvious target.
Remote gaming is the clear focal point of the gambling tax increase. Duty on online casino-style products will rise from 21 percent to 40 percent, marking the single largest shift in remote gambling taxation in the UK to date. Reeves told MPs the category is associated with the highest levels of gambling harm and should now carry the heaviest fiscal burden.
Land-based gambling, however, emerges largely untouched. Duty on in-person betting will remain unchanged. Horseracing Betting Duty stays at 15 percent, a political reprieve secured after months of sustained pressure from racing bodies, racecourses, and levy stakeholders. The government accepted that racing underpins a wider economic ecosystem spanning employment, bloodstock, rural transport, and levy funding.
Bingo receives the clearest structural relief. From April 2026, bingo duty disappears. For operators, it loosens a fixed cost that has tightened margins through thin years of dwindling footfall, climbing energy bills, and changing social rhythms. Casino Gaming Duty bands will also be frozen for 2026 to 27, offering temporary certainty for land-based casino operators amid wider tax volatility.
The Treasury expects the overall package to raise more than £1 billion by 2031. That revenue is now built into the medium-term fiscal framework. Reeves said it would allow the government to avoid increases in income tax, national insurance or VAT, placing gambling taxation at the centre of the Budget’s revenue settlement.
A separate increase will also apply to remote general betting duty, which will rise from 15 percent to 25 percent. The higher rate will apply to online betting, excluding self-service betting terminals, spread betting, pool betting, and horseracing, further extending the fiscal impact of the gambling tax increase across digital wagering.
Higher taxation does not remove demand. It changes where demand flows. If regulated online offers narrow while offshore alternatives remain visible and price-competitive, the risk of player migration into unlicensed markets increases. This creates a potential enforcement and consumer protection challenge that the Treasury cannot fully model through fiscal forecasting alone.
The British Horseracing Authority welcomed the decision to protect racing from the duty rise, while warning that wider taxation changes across betting could still create indirect pressure on the sport.
In a statement, BHA Acting Chief Executive Brant Dunshea said:
“Today’s welcome outcome demonstrates that the Chancellor has listened to our concerns and rightly recognised that racing is a unique national asset culturally, socially and economically, and we welcome this support.
“Betting on racing is an integral part of the enjoyment of our sport, and maintaining the rate of horserace betting duties is an important step by the Government to help preserve revenue streams and protect the 85,000 jobs supported by the racing sector across the country.
“Racing has been part of the British way of life for hundreds of years. It binds our communities together through shared experience, brings joy to millions, and puts the country on the world stage. It is right that the Government has understood this and acted accordingly.
“At the same time, we recognise that the increase in general taxation on the betting industry may have trickle-down effects on racing. We will work with our partners in the betting industry to understand the implications of this, and how we can work together to ensure that British horseracing continues to thrive.”
BHA Chair Lord Charles Allen welcomed the decision as a strong signal of Government support for racing’s national and international standing.
He said the clarity provided by the Budget would allow the sport to re-engage with ministers and the betting industry on long-term growth and promotion. He concluded,
“The Government has rightly recognised that we are not only a vital part of the fabric of the British way of life, but we are also a global leader and one of the country’s most important soft power levers. We want to maintain Britain’s place on the world stage.”
The Racecourse Association welcomed the exemption but said racecourses would now examine the wider Budget impact across the betting industry.
RCA Chief Executive David Armstrong said:
“The RCA welcomes the decision taken by the Chancellor in today’s Budget to exempt remote betting on British horseracing from planned tax rises.
“While the horseracing exemption is welcome, our sport still faces significant challenges which will need to be addressed.”
Armstrong said racecourses would work closely with the BHA and other stakeholders to understand the implications of wider gambling tax changes on venue operations and local economies.
Arena Racing Company said the decision had prevented what could have been a serious structural blow to the racing industry.
ARC Chief Executive Martin Cruddace said: “We have been clear throughout that harmonisation of tax rates of British racing and other betting and gaming products would gravely impact our industry.
“I am so glad that the Government has recognised that fact and helped put our sport on a path to growth.”
Cruddace also acknowledged the cross-party parliamentary support received from MPs representing racing communities.
The National Trainers Federation described the decision as a relief for trainers but warned that deeper financial pressures remain.
NTF Chief Executive Paul Johnson said:
“The Government’s decision to leave racing’s remote betting tax rate unchanged is one that we view with considerable relief.
“Today’s budget sees us live to fight another day, but the sport has work to do, alongside Government, if we are to create a more prosperous future.”
Johnson said trainers would remain engaged in policy discussions as the industry seeks long-term financial stability.
The Jockey Club welcomed both the Government’s decision and the BHA’s leadership in securing the exemption.
Jockey Club Chief Executive Jim Mullen said:
“We commend both the Government for recognising the unique cultural and economic contribution our sport makes to communities up and down the country, and the BHA for their leadership in uniting our industry to address this important issue.”
Mullen said the group is now assessing the wider operational implications of the Budget as it plans for the 2026 fiscal year. While racing has secured its reprieve, the pressure now shifts decisively to remote operators facing the 40 percent duty shock.
After months of industry speculation, the immediate shockwave of the gambling tax increase will be felt across remote efficiency models. A jump to a 40 per cent rate resets margin mathematics overnight. For operators built on high-volume, low-margin play, the room for manoeuvre narrows sharply. Cost absorption will be uneven. Larger multi-vertical groups may cushion the hit through scale and cross-product yield. Smaller remote first operators face a far harsher recalibration.
Commercial strategy now enters a phase of forced triage. Marketing spend, bonus architectures, affiliate exposure, and CRM intensity will all come under review. Operators will test where elasticity breaks. Some will attempt to pass costs downstream by offering lower prices and tighter value propositions. Others will quietly absorb margin compression to protect market share in the short term. Either path carries structural risk.
Product mix will also start to shift. If remote gaming becomes materially less profitable, attention will drift toward lower-duty verticals and hybrid channels. While land-based gambling remains fiscally stable, digital convenience still holds behavioural gravity. The tension between tax efficiency and player demand will shape platform design decisions through the next operating cycle.
There is also a behavioural layer that the Treasury cannot fully model. Higher taxation does not remove demand. It reshapes where demand flows. If compliant offers narrow while offshore alternatives remain visible, the gambling tax increase risks accelerating channel displacement into less regulated spaces. The line between deterrence and diversion is thin and historically difficult to police.
For racing, protection brings relief but not insulation. Levy dependency ties racing’s long-term health directly to the performance of the very remote operators now under fiscal strain, linking today’s tax decisions to tomorrow’s funding flows. Shielded today, horseracing remains indirectly exposed to tomorrow’s margin tightening.
This is not simply a tax adjustment. It is a structural stress test of how commercial sustainability, consumer protection, and fiscal policy coexist inside a single regulated market. The proof will not emerge in spreadsheets this year. It will show in player behaviour, operator exits, and product recalibration over the next three.
The gambling tax increase marks a decisive transformation in how the Treasury now views the sector. Gambling is no longer treated as a peripheral revenue line. It has been folded directly into the core mechanics of fiscal planning. The message is clear. Where harm is judged to be greatest, the tax burden will follow.
For the government, the policy achieves twin aims. It aligns taxation with public health framing while protecting headline personal taxes. Remote gambling carries the cost. Income tax, national insurance and VAT remain untouched. Politically, that is a clean trade. Economically, it places a narrow but powerful sector at the centre of long-term revenue strategy.
For operators, the next phase will not be shaped by the Budget speech but by response. Some will reengineer product margins and marketing intensity, and some will consolidate. Some may retreat. Those that survive will do so by proving they can balance commercial resilience with demonstrable consumer protection in a far tighter margin environment.
For horseracing, today delivers breathing space rather than immunity. Protection at the duty level offers immediate relief, but racing’s financial ecosystem remains tied to the health of remote operators through levy flows and sponsorship, both now operating under the shadow of the gambling tax increase. What weakens one limb of the market inevitably tugs at another.
And for the regulator, the real work begins now. Higher taxation does not reduce demand by decree. It redirects it. The success or failure of this policy will ultimately be judged not by Treasury forecasts but by whether regulated play remains attractive enough to hold players inside the licensed system.
The Budget drew its line. The market now answers.
#UKBudget2025 #GamblingTax #iGamingRegulation #RemoteGamingDuty #UKGambling
Welcome to Gambling Consulting Authority (GCA) - Your Strategic Partner in Gambling Industry Advancement
